8.12.2021

. Blow dis salt atcha seance : Dog ******g Chicken ... • Geraldo Rivera es te controversial cstances ... • LSU •PRESNTIAL •PHIATRY •ubR

i will let  you the picture:

Dog Fg Chicken Hr Mn ...

See Ya at What Gets Me Hot

Did they encounter similar incidents?  •The girls say yes but this guy was the worst.  •What do they think of the outfits?  •It is okay as long as they can ...

 

 • LSU  •PRESIDENTIAL  •PSYCHIATRY   •ubeR

•

. Blow dis salt atcha seance

... See Ya at What Gets Me Hot • https://visualguidanceltd.blogspot.com • intercultural limning lifelike scenes • dougmeet •. Show less Show more ...
Summary for https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/29/us/politics/supreme-court-eviction-ban.html:
In urging the Supreme Court to leave the moratorium in place, the government said that continued vigilance against the spread of the coronavirus was needed and noted that Congress has appropriated tens of billions of dollars to pay for rent arrears. (58)
 
 
  1. WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Tuesday refused to lift a moratorium on evictions that had been imposed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in response to the coronavirus pandemic. (55)
  2. “The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention exceeded its existing statutory authority by issuing a nationwide eviction moratorium,” Justice Kavanaugh wrote. (49)
  3. “Because the C.D.C. plans to end the moratorium in only a few weeks, on July 31, and because those few weeks will allow for additional and more orderly distribution of the congressionally appropriated rental assistance funds, I vote at this time to deny the application” that had been filed by landlords, real estate companies and trade associations. (49)
  4. “In doing so,” the challengers told the justices, “the C.D.C. shifted the pandemic’s financial burdens from the nation’s 30 to 40 million renters to its 10 to 11 million landlords — most of whom, like applicants, are individuals and small businesses — resulting in over $13 billion in unpaid rent per month.” The total cost to the nation’s landlords, they wrote, could approach $200 billion. (48)
  5. The moratorium defers but does not cancel the obligation to pay rent; the challengers wrote that this “massive wealth transfer” would “never be fully undone.” Many renters, they wrote, will be unable to pay what they owe. (41)
Best words:
  1. moratorium (16)
  2. court (7)
  3. government (5)
  4. wrote (5)
  5. congress (4)
  6. supreme (4)
  7. agency (4)
  8. challengers (4)
  9. 1944 (3)
  10. landlords (3)
Keyword highlighting:
  • In urging the Supreme Court to leave the moratorium in place, the government said that continued vigilance against the spread of the coronavirus was needed and noted that Congress has appropriated tens of billions of dollars to pay for rent arrears.
  • WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Tuesday refused to lift a moratorium on evictions that had been imposed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in response to the coronavirus pandemic.
  • “The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention exceeded its existing statutory authority by issuing a nationwide eviction moratorium,” Justice Kavanaugh wrote.
  • “Because the C.D.C. plans to end the moratorium in only a few weeks, on July 31, and because those few weeks will allow for additional and more orderly distribution of the congressionally appropriated rental assistance funds, I vote at this time to deny the application” that had been filed by landlords, real estate companies and trade associations.
  • “In doing so,” the challengers told the justices, “the C.D.C. shifted the pandemic’s financial burdens from the nation’s 30 to 40 million renters to its 10 to 11 million landlords — most of whom, like applicants, are individuals and small businesses — resulting in over $13 billion in unpaid rent per month.” The total cost to the nation’s landlords, they wrote, could approach $200 billion.
  • The moratorium defers but does not cancel the obligation to pay rent; the challengers wrote that this “massive wealth transfer” would “never be fully undone.” Many renters, they wrote, will be unable to pay what they owe.
Sentences:

  1. The C.D.C. had imposed an eviction moratorium, saying it was needed to address the coronavirus pandemic.

  2. Published June 29, 2021Updated Aug.

  3. WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Tuesday refused to lift a moratorium on evictions that had been imposed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in response to the coronavirus pandemic.

  4. The vote was 5 to 4, with Chief Justice John G.

  5. Roberts Jr.

  6. and Justices Stephen G.

  7. Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Brett M.

  8. Kavanaugh in the majority.

  9. The court gave no reasons for its ruling, which is typical when it acts on emergency applications.

  10. But Justice Kavanaugh issued a brief concurring opinion explaining that he had cast his vote reluctantly and had taken account of the impending expiration of the moratorium.

  11. “The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention exceeded its existing statutory authority by issuing a nationwide eviction moratorium,” Justice Kavanaugh wrote.

  12. “Because the C.D.C. plans to end the moratorium in only a few weeks, on July 31, and because those few weeks will allow for additional and more orderly distribution of the congressionally appropriated rental assistance funds, I vote at this time to deny the application” that had been filed by landlords, real estate companies and trade associations.

  13. He added that the agency might not extend the moratorium on its own.

  14. At the beginning of the pandemic, Congress declared a moratorium on evictions, which lapsed last July.

  15. The C.D.C. then issued a series of its own moratoriums.

  16. “In doing so,” the challengers told the justices, “the C.D.C. shifted the pandemic’s financial burdens from the nation’s 30 to 40 million renters to its 10 to 11 million landlords — most of whom, like applicants, are individuals and small businesses — resulting in over $13 billion in unpaid rent per month.” The total cost to the nation’s landlords, they wrote, could approach $200 billion.

  17. The moratorium defers but does not cancel the obligation to pay rent; the challengers wrote that this “massive wealth transfer” would “never be fully undone.” Many renters, they wrote, will be unable to pay what they owe.

  18. In urging the Supreme Court to leave the moratorium in place, the government said that continued vigilance against the spread of the coronavirus was needed and noted that Congress has appropriated tens of billions of dollars to pay for rent arrears.

  19. The challengers argued that the moratorium was not authorized by the law the agency relied on, the Public Health Service Act of 1944.

  20. The C.D.C. argued that the moratorium was authorized by the 1944 law.

  21. The case was complicated by congressional action in December, when lawmakers briefly extended the C.D.C.’s moratorium through the end of January in an appropriations measure.

  22. When Congress took no further action, the agency again imposed moratoriums under the 1944 law.

  23. In its Supreme Court brief, the government argued that it was significant that Congress had embraced the agency’s action, if only briefly.

  24. Last month, Judge Dabney L.

  25. Friedrich of the Federal District Court in Washington ruled that the agency had exceeded its powers in issuing the moratorium.

  26. Judge Friedrich granted a stay of her decision while the government appealed, leaving the moratorium in place.

  27. A unanimous three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit declined to lift the stay, saying the government was likely to prevail on appeal.

  28. Whatever else may be said about the eviction moratorium, the challengers told the Supreme Court, it has outlived its purpose.

  29. “The government may wish to prolong the moratorium to see out its economic-policy goals,” they wrote, “but that does not render its stated justification plausible.

 

  1.  

    LSUHSC FMOLH - OLOL Residential Psychiatry Program Residents FMOLH Vice President and CEO Our Lady of the Lake (OLOL) Regional Medical Center;Bicameral Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Board of Supervisors; William F.Tate IV, LSU President;

  2. and any whose eyes through HIPPA be authorized to read this grievance of injury and medical malfeasance ...

    Mark Zielenski MD., MARK HENRY ZIELINSKI M.D. Lake physician group FMOL / OLOL (NPI Number: 1194875625) Assistant Professor psychology Residential Program LSU-HSC School of Medicine, DEPARTMENT OF RESIDENTIAL PSYCHIATRY PROGRAM, BATON ROUGE CAMPUS

     

    WILL DIRECT you through a two-year, 1500-hour course and curricula program--through consultation under his superintendence, and through his mentorship.

Important work toward post-residential practice, and as beneficiary of that which FMOLHS statement calls 'the largest healthcare center in the state."

Another Catholic charitable institution worth billions of dollars (1.3 BILLION net, 2013), consisting of 6 LA Hospitals, and other tax-free, FEDERALLY funded healthcare, EDUCATION, AND LAND DEALS, as considerations too varied to detail--all run by sisters and friars? Of course not.


(FMOLH - OLOL) Executive Board consists of one clerical representative--the other board members are businessmen, very well-connected in every aspect of state and local business and politics -- as was their former president, convicted of embezzling throughout his term and under their nose--I wonder-- virtually a million dollars -- half that stolen cash was paid to 2 LSU football players--check to see who the coach was in 2018--as bribes--YOUR MONEY).

Remember that next time your wait in the ER is over 2 hours.


All designations together, additionally binding than any individually considered, through constitutional duty of LSU FMOL joint Medical faculty agreement and enrollment in full Medicaid (CMS)

I formally request immediate reinstatement of my improvidently FORCIBLY relinquished status as patient --under whose domain these egregious, unhinged machinations of an unhinged doctor usher forth, through an epicene flood of moral turpitude, through inequality and punishment of an alleged, unproven, non-injurious complaint, to facilitate termination June 2, 2021, 20 minutes before I was to patch through for a televisit.


  2. OFFENSES COMMITTED AGAINST SWORN CODE OF MEDICAL ETHICS, THE POSSIBILITY OF RESCISSION IF Assistant Professor Mark Zielinski, MD., WHOSE SUPERVISION AS ASSOCIATE PSYCHIATRIST THROUGH ANY NUMEROUS AVENUES OF REPORTING HIS ACTIONABLE FRAUD, SUBORNATION, AND CONVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES OF PATIENT TERMINATION in RETALIATION, through MANUFACTURING and WEAPONIZING A BENIGN, EVEN IF TRUE--BUT ABSOLUTELY FALSE--CLAIM OF his nurse reporting to him one week after the fact, her HEARING PROFANITY OVER THE TELEPHONE, AND FROM THIS ONE INCIDENT IN FIVE YEARS OF ASSOCIATION AS, FIRST MY RESIDENT PSYCHIATRIST THERAPIST UNDER HIS SUPERVISION, AND THEN AS MY THERAPIST FOR THE LAST THREE YEARS, THIS THIRD PARTY ALLEGED NURSE'S REPORT BELATEDLY AND CONSPICUOUSLY TIMED FOR HIS DECISION TO RENDER MY IMMEDIATE EMERGENCY PUNISHMENT ONE WEEK AFTER THE TIME OF THE FALSE CLAIM BY EITHER HIM OR HIS NURSE, THAT HE DID, 20 MINUTES BEFORE A SCHEDULED TELEVISIT APPOINTMENT HAVE HIS NEW OFFICE MANAGER CALL ME AND DISMISS ME FOR HIM FROM THE CLINIC--EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY, WITH NO INFORMATION, NOR ANY INFORMATION ABOUT RECOURSE, OR REFERRAL TO ANOTHER DOCTOR, OR PRESCRIPTIONS FOR MEDICATION PRESCRIBED BY HIM AND VITAL TO NOT STOP--AFTER WHICH AND UNTIL TODAY, HE AND EVERY OTHER MEMBER OF HIS PRACTICE, STAFF, COLLEAGUES, UP THROUGH ADMINISTRATION, TO EXECUTIVE TO BOARD MEMBERS, NONE OF WHICH HAVE REPLIED BY EMAIL OR TELEPHONE, OR SOCIAL MEDIA, TO ANY OF MY SCORES OF REQUESTS FOR DUE PROCESS AS MANDATED BY MULTIPLE FEDERAL INSTITUTIONS WHICH GOVERN THE CATHOLIC NOT FOR PROFIT, TAX-EXEMPT, MEDICAID AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT FUNDED CMS, HHS, AND HHS-CR, AND MANY MORE AGENCIES, ALL RECENTLY INCENTIVIZED AND AUTHORIZED FOR DIRECT INTERVENTION AND PROSECUTION OF BREACHES OF MEDICAL ETHICAL STANDARDS, AND DOUBLY SO FOR FAILURES OF PROTOCOL OR OBVIOUS MANIPULATION AND ABANDONMENT OR FALSE TERMINATION ACTIONS, USUALLY OF LAST RESORT, AND ALWAYS PROVIDED WITH THE ASSIDUITY OF DUE PROCESS, APPEAL, AND CLAIMS OF FRAUD, MALFEASANCE, AND RECKLESS DERELICTION OF HIS LICENSURE AND ABILITY TO PERFORM HIS DUAL DUTIES AS BOTH A PSYCHIATRIST, AS WELL AS SUPERVISING AN ENTIRE NEW GROUP OF RESIDENTIAL PSYCHIATRISTS WHOSE ENTIRE TWO YEAR PROGRAM WILL BE MOLDED AND SHAPED BY A FRAUD AND A CHARLATAN, DESPERATE AND DERANGED TO THE POINT OF RUINING A PATIENTS FUTURE FOR THE FAST AND EASY TERMINATION OF WHICH COULD HAVE BEEN EASILY AVOIDED THROUGH THE REGULAR CHANNELS OF SEEING ANOTHER DOCTOR, BUT WHOSE ACTIONS ARE UNBALANCED AND SHOW DERANGEMENT, INCLUDING THE PUNISHMENT WHOSE FALSELY ALLEGED CRIME DOES NOT EVEN RISE TO THE LEVEL OF THOSE PATIENT RULES OF CONDUCT, WHICH INCIDENTALLY, WERE NEVER GIVEN TO ME, AND WHICH YOU WILL FIND, NO SIGNED COPY OF RECEIPT--HE HAS BEEN REDUCED TO A SLOPPY, CARELESS, OVERZEALOUS, CAREENING DOCTOR WHO HAS WASTED HIS PROFESSIONAL LEGACY ON THE OPPORTUNISTIC EXPLOITATION OF HIS RANK AND PRIVILEGE TO CONCOCT A MESSY GROUP OF CO-CONSPIRATORS IN HIS FAILED ATTEMPT TO FRAME A PATIENT THROUGH THE ENLISTMENT AND COLLUSION OF THREE OTHER COLLEAGUES, WHOSE DECISION TO RISK THEIR CAREERS ON HELPING HIM IN THIS PROFANE ENDEAVOR IS AS UNSTEADY AND FRAGILE IN THEIR EFFORT, INCLUDING DR.

  3. TYNE'S AND DR.

  4. CRAPANZANO'S DECISION TO NOT REPORT HIS ACTIONS, AND DR.


  6. LSUHSC FMOLH - OLOL Residential Psychiatry Program Residents (2021- ?);

  7.  ... Louisiana State University is a public university.
  8. I was victim to physician abandonment, as recognized and defined by the AMA Code of Medical Ethics, terminated of clinic and medical rights, autonomously denied access to vital medication, denied ethical doctor referral, denied due process and appeal as stated in FMOL and all AMA Healthcare Centers, as listed in their Bill of Patient Rights, blacklisted from communication or contact at all levels of FMOLH, from June 2, 2021 (date of Physician Retaliation Abandonment / Termination by Office Manager) - August 10, 2021 (today's date - having been denied medication, I am suffering symptoms of withdrawal and of the diagnosed conditions by Mark Zielinski MD., who upon allegations of a third party has weaponized an unchecked allegation of "profanity over a telephone," in maneuvering untruthful connivance against best practices recommended by the American Medical Association and APA, whose oversight it falls, he has weaponized this benign allegation (even if true, but it is not) in an outrageous excuse to see me gone from clinic (his second attempt)

     


  9. June 2, 2021, 20 minutes before I was to patch through for a televisit, I was interrupted by his new office manager who explained to me that I would not be needing to wait for the televisit, as Dr Zielinski had delegated her to inform me that as of right now, I was no longer to be seen by him ever--a mendacious malevolent cut to the throat after the lie whose stab in the spine had sent me to the floor, by a physician who was not from Baton Rouge, had not grown up in that hospital, born there,whose Alma Mater, LSU,DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS, RELIEVING HIM OF A RECORDED HISTORY WITH CLINIC, WHOSE EXAMPLES OF MINOR VICTORY show accolades for the report many years ago of a FRONT DESK (also coincidentally, where this excuse for termination emanates) OF DISQUALIFICATION was forced to ATTEND a CLASS, FOR WHICH I POSSESS A PERSONALLY WRITTEN THANK YOU FROM THE DEPT.HEAD.
  10. SHE FOUND AN SHOCKING ENDEMIC CULTURE OF ABUSE, ANTI-WHITE RACIST BEHAVIOR, HAVING ANONYMOUSLY POLLED FOR ONLY A FEW HOURS, VARIOUS INCOMING CALLS BY A RANDOM ASSORTMENT OF CALLERS, IN HER WORDS.

  12. A REPOSITORY OF MULTIPLE USERS IN A NON SECURE OFFICE, WHOSE OUTGOING MESSAGE IS SO LONG THAT IF ANYTHING WERE TO SAVE ITS EASE OF COMPROMISE BY OFFICE WORKER OR HACKER, EAGER TO SCORE PSYCH PATIENTS LIST-FULLS OF, AS DEMANDED BY ITS INTERMINABLE OUTGOING MESSAGE: NAMES, SPELLINGS, BIRTHDATES, PRESCRIPTION REFILL DETAILS--EVERYTHING NEEDED TO FAKE A PRESCRIPTION, FIND OUT WHERE AND UNDER WHOSE NAME TO PICK ONE UP AT WHICH DRUGSTORE, AND OTHER NEFARIOUS PLOTS WHICH IN THE FIVE YEARS IN WHICH I HAVE BEEN FORCED TO ATTEND CLINIC (AFTER THE POLICY WIDE DECISION TO PROHIBIT GENERAL PRACTITIONERS FROM PRESCRIBING PSYCH LITE DRUGS FROM PROZAC TO VALIUM, NOW REQUIRING A PSYCHIATRIST TO OBTAIN VERY SAME MEDICINE WITH THE BENEFIT OF PSYCHOLOGICAL PRACTICES GETTING A SPECIALIZATION GROUP TO PILE ON HEALTHCARE INDUSTRY AND CHARGE TWO OFFICE VISITS WHERE IT USED TO TAKE ONLY ONE-- BUT SAY GOODBYE OLD PRACTICES, POST-COVID), THE POLICY, DESIGNED BY, WHO ELSE, ASSOCIATE PSYCHIATRIST, MARK ZIELINSKI, REMAINS UNCHANGED, AS HE DOES.

  13. FROM THE SILENCE OF THE NEWLY SOCIAL MEDIA-ENABLED (FIRST BLACK PRESIDENT OF A UNIVERSITY IN THE S.E.C.), PRESIDENT OF LSU-- A PERSONAL LETTER TO HIM IN AN OFFICIALLY SANCTIONED FORMAT TO ONE OF HIS OFFICIAL SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORM SITES OF COMMUNICATION, TO PRESIDENT CEO OF OLOL FMOLHS
    .
    AND MOST SHOCKINGLY, OUT OF EVERY PERSON OF THE CONSIDERABLE LIST OF MANDATED REPORTERS AND REPRESENTATIVES IT IS AS REQUIREMENT TO KEEP THEIR JOBS, MOSTLY BECAUSE OF THIS: WHOSE MEDICAID FUNDING AND TAX FREE EXEMPTION COMPEL IT TO BE UNDER THE MOST EXACTING LETTER OF ITS NEWLY CHANGING CODE OF MEDICAL ETHICS.


    1. A physician shall uphold the standards of professionalism, be honest in all professional interactions, and strive to report physicians deficient in character or competence, or engaging in fraud or deception, to appropriate entities.

    2. A physician shall respect the law and also recognize a responsibility to seek changes in those requirements which are contrary to the best interests of the patient.

    3. A physician shall respect the rights of patients, colleagues, and other health professionals, and shall safeguard patient confidences and privacy within the constraints of the law.

    4. A physician shall continue to study, apply, and advance scientific knowledge, maintain a commitment to medical education, make relevant information available to patients, colleagues, and the public, obtain consultation, and use the talents of other health professionals when indicated.

    5. A physician shall, in the provision of appropriate patient care, except in emergencies, be free to choose whom to serve, with whom to associate, and the environment in which to provide medical care.

    6. A physician shall recognize a responsibility to participate in activities contributing to the improvement of the community and the betterment of public health.

    7. A physician shall, while caring for a patient, regard responsibility to the patient as paramount.

    8. A physician shall support access to medical care for all people.

Barbara R. McLaughlin M.Div., M.S.W. (1994) Devastated spirituality: The impact of clergy sexual abuse on the survivor's relationship with god and the church, Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 1:2, 145-158, DOI: 10.1080/10720169408400039