(12.27.20 - 1.27.21)
@WyndhamHotels #illegaleviction #RichmondInn
We’re sorry to hear this was your experience and want to help. please follow to send you direct message information @mrjyn every day I find more damning abuses already done. #RichmondInn F'd up & #SMC - silence is not goldenhttps://t.co/E9lWUT5xRz pic.twitter.com/i8KpldQ8Zl
— mrjyn (@mrjyn) 23 janvier 2021
re. illegal eviction
Richmond Suites
GM Trudi Veals
VP John Holstrom,
Baton Rouge, LA
We’re sorry to hear this was your experience and want to help.
- Similarity 25%
Thanks for letting us know, Jessica. We're sorry to hear this was your experience and want to help. Can you send us a direct message with your information?
#Facebook Msg. Proves #Canned #GuestRelations @WyndhamHotels as mechanically.
https://www.duplichecker.com/ https://www.facebook.com/384822708681898/photos/459913091172859/
"Thanks for letting us know ... We're sorry to hear this was your experience and want to help. Can you send ... dm with your info?"
- each day I find additional inculpatory abuses already done. #RichmondInn & #SMC - silence isn't golden
- Richmond Inn
@WyndhamHotels #illegaleviction
— mrjyn (@mrjyn) 23 janvier 2021
'It looks like we just aren't able to do anything right to make your stay here enjoyable, so I am ordering your checkout tomorrow at noon."
I, being palliate of any condition which could qualify me for non-voluntary order to quit, or for necessity of removal by hotel management, now as throughout my extended period of complaint-free occupancy, either through a record of zero non-payment or tardiness thereon, or dearth of hotel formal or informal grievance concerning me, by Richmond guests during my stay nor by employees, excepting even the admitted vexation herself of discharged Front clerk, Faith, as to any action or overture resembling anything which could merit warning or censure; and having no incidence of violation of any rule, code of conduct, guideline, nor any infringement which could cause necessity of management rebuke, or cautionary reprisal; no conduct requiring anecdotal remark relating to personal behavior bearing on any member of Richmond hotel staff to any guest, or third party associate.
Also, that there is no physical incident, report, or write-up in contradiction of above throughout my 10-month stay, between me with any other Richmond hotel guest except that which incorporates complaints made by me to Security Manager Mike, and in which, guest was alerted and rebuked regarding having been found that criticism was valid on this occasion, and on the last occasion during which proof of other guest was shown by the female party who had been subject to guest's sexual harassment and 100 x texting, offering shabu for sex to individuals this guest had never met, whose contact he made through purloining from me one friend's telephone number, and calling over 100 times on a particularly large meth binge.
Whereas, there is also no unclaimed necessity for negligent non-payment of any account, either antecedently or at this point, or any inexplicit reason requiring the contingency through which I find myself forcibly evicted from my abidance, through the final word requiring the utilization of BRPD to enforce an involuntary, amerciable eviction from aforesaid by threat of force, or through previously filed criminal, or civil instrument, which do not exist, for eviction or writ, granting order, or any necessity of same to corporate entity, stating that any of above legal, civil procedures were supererogatory because of any specification, including exemption from its process aforementioned judiciary, or official, or client-attorney to imply, suggest, or dictate as discovery and preclusion from obligation necessary for action, through proceedings, such as the filing of, and duly ordered serving by municipal agent or appointed legal agent, as mandated by Louisiana law, as with tenant / property owner / renter / lessor agreement; that which states: 'a longtime resident, occupant, lessor, guest, roommate, boyfriend, girlfriend, loved one, squatter, of any paid tenancy habitation, as well as that of 'Residence,' 'Extended stay,' Weekly or Monthly, hotel or lodging, and where guest is stipulated with designation, a novel payment structure differing from that of other guests, as to method, form, schedule of payment, specifically with reference to technique, or format, through which payment is offered, or self-pay of hotel bu hotel, auto-payment, during which guest, or guest agent has established to satisfaction precedent with hotel, and where guest authorizes through signature of contract or invoice and forfeits a duplicate of card to hotel on file during stay; where it is additionally stipulated that guest charges or penalties, if any, ensuing from purchases from hotel, or as result of supplementary amenity or penalty by guest requiring payment are bonded and guaranteed, and never disputed by guest.
... and which, in fact, instead were found to be in breach through neglect, and admitted to, only upon authorizing and charging guest account the accruement of hotel actus reus and failure to perform timely, reasonable self-pay, instead assessing gross payment abruptly to guest, per several months, on twofold throughout guest's ten month residency; whereby, having been discovered by guest, au courant, only once questioning the oversight had been committed by both hotel agents, Faith and Trudi Veals' failure to create mechanical self-payment to hotel, once discovered without authority until notification to guest, without apology, or credit to guest once accounting malfeasance discovery by guest.
She additionally omitted a statement of update and failure to report penalty charge on initial instance of 3 month rental -- RECKLESSLY OR resignedly WITH GROSS NEGLIGENCE AND potential DELIBERATE attempt to CAUSE ECONOMIC HARDSHIP CHARGED IN just one overburdening fee, inflicting gross max x three over normal payment to guest, and complete failure to alert prior to establishment of ineligible self-charge at trebled increase of standard --an overage which might render a reasonable person overdrawn and assessed with bank fee.
Richmond gm Trudi Veals' mistake ... or what would you call it?
Failure to warn, forestall, hazard, account for, apprise, call on the telephone! Prior to a triple-the-amount charge from incompetence of hotel as payee, not once, but over a protracted period, and only UPON MY INQUIRY TO TRUDI VEALS, her confusion due to ignorance, her gaff due to derision and contempt.
SCRAMBLING to cover ANOTHER FAULT at FRONT with Faith, OR ROSE, DID SHE ADMIT to abnormal authorization, but only on the second notice of her accounting incompetence.
On this second flub, she or Faith, or THEY together, were now accountable for combining a period of 2 months rental, having failed once again to simply charge rent by the month; and where determining it as uncharged, not having remembered the basic procedural accommodation one usually extends to customers whose fault it cannot be; here two identically charged -- this overage being for a 2-month pattern of languorous abuse, now charged, once more with no WARNING OR explanation -- an implausibly identical exploit of incompetent monetary intimidation ...
Once, maybe. Twice?
A serious likelihood of insubordination / cause for potential termination, or forensic accounting investigation.
There exists no record of violation by guest, filed by staff, to SMC, or any other member of SMC hotel group, whose business it's been for twenty years to superintend and otherwise run with acumen befitting its designation which in one among many of its day to day operations it is public information that in 2019 the company was calculated to have earned a sum of $13 million -- safely assuring that its personal finances, at least, are overseen with competence due to the wisdom of twenty years in business; however, where it comes to the micro-management of its business venture, when that day-to-day is off-site and out-of-mind, there is a truly ironic casting of dual roles I have discovered to be its 'business.'
SMC Hotel Group's business is the discovery, takeover, and restructuring of derelict hotel properties, administering them to specification for fulfillment through modification and reorganization of their failing -- the irony being that Richmond Inn when originally purchased twenty five years past, too would have 'fallen' into this category of necessary rehab, and 25 years in the past, would have resembled their business model -- so that 25 years hence, it might only only be expected that this property was designated at some point to be a project no more, but instead, kept to run as a profitable hotel in Baton Rouge -- a city which SMC has no other stake or interest, besides the easy journey for which clients can be managed through 25 years of LSU Tiger Football seasons (I am sure of it).
But through failure to maintain over a quarter century any hotel, although, superficially passable, this hotel has again fallen into the disrepair and squalidness only untrained staff, or those trained badly, as here, is shown by example under the management of Trudi Veals -- of whom, I said, after I had witnessed it occur the day Ms. Veals was overridden to ground -- her idle, punitory manipulation to affect the removal of the cause, me (forgetting the cause came from the employee), of the inexplicable personality hitch which her most serious-seeming employees, by her compulsive failure of self-control to which I had been target of, as the most outrageous, serial insubordination disbursed through a personal attack, unprovoked, I have experienced in 50 years of experience.
If left unmonitored, her delusional flights of concept and magic thought, including a particularly virulent predilection I recognized in her through a fantastical imagining, roaming mind, and her inability to control her compulsivity in relating it as fact, causing her to lie baldly to me on numerous occasions in incredible constructions of ridiculous hotel policies or harmless absurd false bits of information, meant only to entertain her during these hyper-manic episodes, and which upon confrontation, she could happily revisit, delighting herself again by shockingly admitting as to the veracity of the complaint, which it seems peculiar to me, that as a representative of Richmond Inn & Suites, Baton Rouge, LA, this untenable behavior would have been left unaddressed for even the year in which she had retained her position, and in which it must be assumed she had either been accommodated, or encouraged from boredom by the management of Trudi Veals.
As for myself, I had been referred by a Richmond Inn former employee, a prospering sales agent at the newly opened boutique property, the first Baton Rouge Tru by Hilton, where I had met Ms. Trina Bankston and found her to be a truly kind and intelligent person.
Having asked her opinion on larger accommodations, she was singular in directing me to the property of which she had been employed, the same Richmond Inn.
She is now appalled at the events, only some of which will fit in this ridiculous list of How Not To Run An Hotel -- henceforth, her intervention and advocacy came swiftly at my request, and necessarily, when on the first occasion of Trudi Veals' slippery passive-aggressive attempt to have me find other accommodations, due to my interaction (I was present) with Front Desk Clerk, Faith, it is no exaggeration to say that she saved me from the scheming, attempt of Trudi's initial try at eviction, without which -- I am sure this has occurred on many occasions in the recent past, and know from my own experience with a guest who had it happen to them, a friend who liked my suite, and made reservations, only to find himself victim to a small con which Faith and Ms. Veals apparently enjoyed performing (as it then occurred to the next person who I was acquaintance who stayed, and was charged again). My friend was a guest for one night. He left the room in perfect order. When he discovered that his credit card had been accessed for the security amount, he drove down to the property and inquired as to the reason for the $250 assessment, where he was informed by a very nervous Rose, working at Front that afternoon, that she did not know anything and that he would have to come back or call for Ms. Veals. Upon further inquiry as to the evidence of the supposed waterlogged mattress which had just been left that day at noon, he was nervously informed that it had already been disposed of in the garbage, and upon his question asking if he could then see the room, or view the videotape of the mattress being removed on its way to the dumpster, he was then informed that no he couldn't and furthermore, there was no video document of that nature. He, of course, filed a grievance with his credit card company and his bank, and he was charged back successfully after a full investigation to the satisfaction of those institutions that he had, in fact, been overcharged in a scheme of which their appeared to be a frequent serial nature.
For me, through my contacting Ms. Bankston, and her expediting, perhaps because of guilt she may have felt undeservedly for her referral to me, her contact with her recent boss, SMC Hotels Group, Vice President of Operations, John Holmstrom, would on this one occasion be the only reason that I would find relief from the inscrutably vindictive Trudi Veals.
Her Jekyll and Hyde temperament I would first truly become aware as it related to the violation which she apparently felt due to some overbearing sense of pride at the illusion which she had been fortunate enough to maintain to those managers at SMC, of whom now, John Holmstrom, she found herself thinking, was the first to see the ugly truth up close, in an unwelcome reveal, she briefly showed me her teeth and her true self through an inappropriate hysterical warning, upbraiding me about my decision to contact Ms. Bankston regarding the 'in-house problem' at Richmond," and, "would I not do it that way again ..."
Unbeknownst to me, this was the day Trudi Veals retired, gave up, quit ... she simply forgot to put in notice ...
I would like to thank John Holmstrom, VP Operations, SMC Hotel Group for his fair-minded consideration of my initial controversies at Richmond Inn & Suites, where through an endemic culture of anti-white racism overseen by GM Trudi Veals throughout my stay at Baton Rouge Richmond Inn & Suites, Wyndham Hotel Trademark Collection, I witnessed it become reinvigorated on the occasion that with respectfully acknowledged, unparalleled difficulty, John Holmstrom, through what strikes me as extremely unique in my experience -- good intuitive contravention and guest support -- in refusing to authorize Trudi Veals request to evict me over nothing.
VP John Holmstrom's refusal to support Ms. Veals, his seasoned general manager for what must have been transparent and fallacious, and through Ms. Bankston's counseling, I think he came to see, through her condensed version of my still disbelieving shock in trying to explain, he finally decided that he could not instantiate her wishes to kick me out of the hotel for nothing that he could find for cause -- ordering the first 'Eviction Attempt' by Trudi Veals rescinded, and her unsuccessful freeze-out of a paid-in-advance, in-full guest, which only due to her loss of rational lust for reprisal did my occupancy at Richmond last from my check-in February 27, 2020 until December 27 2020, where she demonstrated through a bevy of personally motivated, irrational strikes the embodiment of the statement,
"either the guest (me) leave, or she make him feel as if he should," and barring that, it was an inevitability which I do not think I forgive.
Its first attempt went like this -- when unexpectedly and strangely, she called my room over hotel landline telephone, and said,
surreptitiously the monkey 🐒 🐵
It’s noon, and the monkey looks at the flagpole, and the great pronged and long, blacked-out by its location and juxtaposition, preventing rays of infinitely powerful light-source from reaching the ground without a stamped-out, time-sensitive but variably regular demarcation which signifies a credible stand between inanimate fumerol as a slight win for flagpole and patriotic stand against Nature, double negative, doubly entropic perturbation of shine shield Sun to Earth and to this Aluminum Sapling, proving Goldilocks' requirements were, as much as we din, throwing shade, 'just right,'
