|
|
|
|
Youtube's hat is a metaphorical overemotional lance to the HTML 5! Communist Dailymotion's player gains testing phase like a band of semi-transparent browsers which automatically disappear after a few seconds - the small square buttons are large on top, but good or bad, the image sharing Video is the inspiration for songs. The video is clear, but afterglow - not both. Why? Ask your wife if you speak again.
The new buttons to push (not your wife, this time) are designed to simplify the maximum hair of the video that bit you, and the fruity characteristics go down gently, Moses, if your eye-nighted binge de nothingness gives up nothing more than digitalis, and gets you in dutch with your family . "Tablecloth are to posts what May is to April: click on two, you blind link, click on one, and we all have a link to the video on the site. The declarative English clapboard remembers an old Trailways Timely hickory HTML Code: integration in the South failed because of the sub-layers and mixed marriages, so that ducks do not always double-header a single, to use an American Baseball idiom. Add a link to time, reference, point, record, new, and well, and that YouTube hat suddenly doesn't click so smoothly, re preliminarily ... but what exactly is on second? Videlicet tender.
Cooperativeness? "Hey, you've seen Lego skin. Look how he made a bad end mustache pirouette into good behavior! Dead Star 90's Playboy Centerfold led directly to the overturned wreckage of 90 years of video surveillance by the one and only Hugh Heffner and his bandstand of botoxed, blonde bimbos, braying banefully behind bitumen Baristas, but the double latte tastes the same.
It is always possible to customize featherbedding, but custom beds sleep the same over or under. Ex-Tex abortionists' new Video's 'all bout da chooses,' megapixel images, width, new or used, and you're welcome.
All these things are testamentary, brandy, fine yellow buttons, blown calls or video connections. Choose or lose!It is always possible to customize the code "embed" link via the "customize embed code" below the video, and new option to choose yourself the image width in pixels is downright welcome.
All these things are beautiful testable byAnd the yellow button under the video calls to raise the feedback.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Questions de vie ou de LOL pour les réseaux sociaux Questions of life and LOL for social networksby Camille Caldini
tag: network Social
CC krossbow
Cike if there was no enough, a new kind of network Social format question / answer emerges from few weeks. And it is far from Proust Questionnaire.
"Pepsi or Coke? "The principle of these new networks is basic: "Ask anything, share your Answers ". Clinging to the enormous success of Twitter, Onioning.comThe site self-proclaimed leader of network of questions and answers (without reveal the enrollments), limits responses to 140 signs, proposed 'Follow' other users and share his answers on his Twitter profile. Original. The argument of J. Lee clash, the patron of the start-up U.S. created in 2009: "Many social networks are not structured: you can do anything and tweeter share photos on Facebook. But Onioning is a network targeting social, that people can join to learn more about each other. " What's better Indeed, to know that to ask if someone sing in the shower, and if so what. For those who have no friends, a public space they can still respond to questions, addressed at all (speaking of preference).
Difficult to determine the public of Onioning. Several indicators, however, betray the onioning users. com. As this issue metaphysical recurring example:
|
 |
|
Isabelle Adjani réclame 150 000 euros au docteur Delajoux
Isabelle Adjani réclame 150 000 euros au docteur DelajouxL’actrice a demandé à son ancien compagnon, récemment évoqué au sujet de l’opération de Johnny Hallyday, de lui rembourser la somme qu’elle lui avait prêtée pour financer une fondation “fantôme”. L’actrice française Isabelle Adjani a mis en demeure la société Docteur Plus France, liée à son ancien conjoint, le docteur Stéphane Delajoux et réclamerait 150 000 euros, selon le site internet du Point. En 2009, la comédienne avait prêté cette somme au médecin, récemment évoqué (et critiqué) au sujet de l’opération de Johnny Hallyday, pour financer ce qui devait être un site Internet d’information médicale qui n’a jamais vu le jour et dont elle devait être la marraine. L’avocat de l’actrice, Jeremie Assous, a déclaré à l’AFP : “Le nom d’Isabelle Adjani est associé à une fondation dont on peut douter de l’existence sérieusement, puisqu’il suffit à n’importe qui d’aller sur Internet pour constater que la fondation Docteur Plus n’existe pas”.
En effet, le site internet docteurplus.com semble être une coquille vide et ne renverrait vers aucun lien. De même, dans l’organigramme de la société, le docteur Delajoux “n’apparaît à aucun moment -si ce n’est par l’intermédiaire de sa mère qui en est la gérante-, ni dans la société luxembourgeoise qui est l’associée de la société” du chirurgien, selon Maître Assous. Le couple se serait séparé en décembre 2009. L’avocat de la star a ajouté : “Etre la marraine de quelque chose qui n’existe pas, ça commence à nous poser de sérieuses difficultés”, et qu’ils attendaient “une réponse dans la semaine”. Interrogée par le Point, Isabelle Adjani a déclaré : “La confiance que j’avais accordée a perdu toute raison d’être”.
|
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_uiBuCyMnE8sQg3p7P9zzcVzfhJg5mnD5vWj-Fs35rF6PnFcoPqvf1YvXXopnNCv3_JwAFb6eibGem-GbtzUl6qQzPUe3a9LpAa2uiK9ZXZi-meUBVJ3JKvF7q_WVKVbtn9zNDLfz7y7WEbWq6VSO0=s0-d)
