Objectùm-Sexuality Erika Eiffel married Eiffel Tower, Berlin Wall ALSO Tyra Banks Show "[Quasimodo] loved [the bells], caressed them, talked to them, understood them"
[Quasimodo] loved [the bells],caressed them, talked to them, understood them.
From the carillon in the
steeple of the transept to the great bell over the doorway, they all
shared his love.
Claude Frollo had made him the bell ringer of Notre-Dame, and to
give the great bell in marriage to Quasimodo was to give Juliet to
Romeo.
NOTE:OS-like behavior in classic literature:
Victor Hugo
There is little known about OS other than data
our community has gathered from our personal relationships with objects.
So we are not claiming to have any clinical basis, only the practical
knowledge gained from each other. We welcome and currently seek
professional input and study in regards to OS.
We are not looking for a
cure but more comprehension into our make-up as an emerging part of
society.
Part 1
Tyra Banks features Erika Eiffel
Tyra asks about her objectum sexual relationships
with
Eiffel Tower
and
Berlin Wall
Part 2
Tyra Banks features Erika Eiffel
Tyra asks about her objectum sexual relationships
with
Eiffel Tower
and
Berlin Wall
TRANSCRIPT
Erika Eiffel on Tyra Banks Show:
You be married to the Eiffel tower?
He would propose to the Eiffel tower?
Life actually.
It/she proposed to me.
I know about that accent on there with some friends.
I plan on photograph her with their lights on.
A slight try to defuse the pictures.
And all of a sudden I don't care what the lights went out, house, okay?
Well let's work for it for nothing in my little son there's a
slight and that's...she just can't live in areas like all
these...lights as a classless courageous-and this display, and I think,
"We only, after the fact, and learned well."
I still do that. and it was just like this really special thing, don't they-are the house-what the purpose was that all?
I know is in my heart.
I really felt that...you know, she was crying out.
Here's this beautiful Taiwan parent and she's surrounded by all
these people in one of with each other, and a look at her because she's
so beautiful, but they don't see anything beyond Serbia, like.
I would like supermodel people.
With the supermodels, the city ask the gorgeous exterior, but today actually...think about Mendeleev's landslide and mules.
A human being, US troops, the human being?
To me the Eiffel tower commission really resonates today, and so
my folks, Howard, you can call a car...I do, and so on, because the
King was slain which restricts men to-to...this if...
I use the word it...economy including enemies, the objects, and
if so, what's a hand, no-no, it's the sense that, sir, you know an
object.
This is the ground, in an apparent snub, intelligence, and my
language, the Conan, you noticed that two of its life...Yeah, okay, so,
would you consider some be a lesbian affair, Jack?
I don't feel like actually on the attack, and said to me, "I'm not on six of them.
The mail presence, and again, it's not like you can lift up the
light on the Eiffel tower and check to see what you know...percent.
Objectùm-Sexuality
is an orientation to love objects
Sexual
orientation is defined as the nature of sexual preference while the
prolific definition stands as: the direction of someone's sexual desire
toward people of the opposite gender, people of the same gender, or
people of both.
This does not include objects
However,
orientation itself is defined as: a complex mental state involving
beliefs and feelings and values and dispositions to act in certain ways.
This does include objects as we see it.
We love objects and many
of us in an intimate way, and this feeling is innate.
Objectùm-sexual
love comes for most in a similar awakening as other sexuality at the
start of puberty.
This is often followed by an acute awareness that we
do not relate to peers, due to the source of the projected feelings.
Often objectùm-sexual people feel outcast or pressured by mainstream
sexuality with a helpless feeling that we cannot change what comes so
naturally.
What is the natural feeling of OS?
Just as
mainstream are attracted to certain types of people,
physical/intellectual, objectùm-sexuals feel a strong attraction toward
objects possessing, in particular, certain geometry/function.
Often
this attraction is regarded as an obsession to a degree that provokes
criticism.
What makes OS different from an obsession?
Truly
there is not much difference. Love is a feeling that preoccupies one's
thoughts. This in its own right describes a degree of obsession where
all focus is on the one desired. An obsession is based on an extreme
keenness for an object and that defines the significance.
However, the
difference for objectùm-sexuals in our love and attraction for the
object is what devotes our interest to a level that appears merely
obsessive.
How can one love an inanimate object?
Indeed,
the meaning of love comes into question. However, there is no single
definition because this feeling has many levels and crosses every part
of the spectrum. Virtually every one and every thing can be loved.
Love does not have any rules that requisite to whom or to what we
express this multifaceted emotion, as long as it causes no violation or
harm to the subjected.
The spectrum of love is so vast; one may
relate it to a bell curve. In the middle will certainly appear the
majority of those whose relationships can be characterized by the
similarities to whom and how they love.
And at one end of this curve,
that is where Objectùm-sexuality finds its place. While we have no firm
numerical data, we are clearly a minority which facilitates the
criticism of our way of love and life. But none-the-less, we still fall
under the curve of the enigmatic emotion known as love.
OK, so
the question isn't answered for those who strongly believe that love
must be reciprocated to be in and have a relevant relationship.
Naturally, if one sees objects as inanimate, then objectùm-sexual love
and our relationships would undeniably be scrutinized. Indeed, there
are cases of love being one-sided as with any orientation, but in
general we do feel love in return.
How can one love a public object?
We
do not all love public objects but certainly the ones who do, they may
face complications similar to people in long distance relationships.
Unless there is regular contact, such as working for or around the
object, distance can pose a difficult problem for the development of a
connection.
To overcome the challenge, many objectùm-sexuals build or
acquire scale models. While models cannot replace the original, they
provide a link as an extension of the object. Similar to people
carrying photographs or articles such as jewelry to remind of their
distant lover. Naturally, whenever possible, we prefer to be with the
object we love.
How does one communicate with an object?
One
must learn a structure of language to speak fluently with others. This
comes naturally as a form of adaptation when we are younger or later in
life due to impairment of core communication skills. It is via our
intense feelings (naturally noted as obsession by most) that our
interests are driven in everything related to the object. The more
knowledge we learn and internalize, the more we develop the ability to
sense the object.
Communication comes in many forms besides
verbal. We learn to commune with the object via sensations, not verbal
cues. However, this does not imply that we can converse with all
objects. People communicate better with some people, and less or none
with others, just as we do with objects.
Even so, that does not stop
some objectùm-sexuals from talking aloud to objects as a basic means to
communicate for a person.
Intimacy and OS
As a matter of
course, this is the topic that rouses the most curiosity. The issue of
sex with objects stirs certain inquisitiveness in people that often
leads to censure. And to ask whether we do "it" is like asking whether
all couples in love have sex. Most often the answer is yes but in some
cases, as with any loving relationship, sex is not always present for
whatever personal reason.
Also the definition of sex comes into
question. It is natural to assume that OS people must have sex like
other people to be intimate with an object. This often lends to the
fear towards those who love public objects. Our objects are NOT human
so sex cannot be defined the same way. Intimacy may be simply touching
or more or less for some.
What is the difference between OS intimacy and masturbation?
Clearly
the one of the most irritating questions we entertain when a person
gets a mental image of us in “the act” with an object. Naturally, it
would seem there is no difference because the question is being posed by
one who does not love the object. OS intimacy is not instrumental
manipulation to self pleasure. In the case of a person utilizing some
object in this manner, the object is none other than a means to an end.
To an OS person, our intimate focus is on the object we love.
Is OS a fetish?
No,
objectùm-sexuality is not a fetish. While a fetishist must have their
desired object present as a catalyst to achieve sexual gratification,
the love for our object is not based on a habitual psychosexual
response. It is the object that captivates us on many more levels
besides sexual arousal.
Fetishists do not see the object as animate as
we do and therefore do not commence to develop a loving relationship
with the object.
Are there factors that cause one to be OS?
Of
course, we have all asked the question WHY to ourselves time and again
but currently no definitive answer can be found to explain our tendency
to form relationships with objects.
However, as we grow as a
community, we have internally discovered that less than one-third of OS
people are also diagnosed with Asperger's syndrome, a spectrum of
autism.
The study of any existing relationship is still pending
but it is possible that objectùm-sexuals with Aspergers syndrome relate
to certain objects of interest better than people, due to impaired social
functioning from early childhood, when mainstream social bonds are
influenced and conditioned.
This may include an underlying link
for a small percent of objectùm-sexuals with a history of severe
childhood trauma who suffer anxiety in personal relations with people
due to trust issues.
There is also a denominator of gender dysphoria among a small percentage of objectùm-sexuals.
The
possibility of links exists yet most people with the above mentioned
are not OS at all and more than half of objectùm-sexuals report no
outstanding psychological condition. They are very adept and function
well socially which lends more to their fear of coming out and
disrupting the balance.
Are there fears regarding OS people?
Sadly,
the media has a blatant history of sensationalizing the sexual aspect
and portraying a false sense that we are openly sexual, thus raising
fears of OS people behaving inappropriately in public. When in reality,
most OS people are very keen on preserving the integrity of the object
and clearly respect that intimacy is private. This is even more so for
those who love landmark objects.
Why do OS people love landmark objects?
Understand
that only a very small percentage of objectùm-sexuals love well-known
landmarks due to the complexities involved. It is often least desired
to love an object shared with so many.
However, the presence of a
landmark draws more attention and may offer the OS person a deeper
sense of connection due to the pronounced availability of information
about the object. There stems a likelihood that interest could develop.
Beyond that, it is between the person and the object if a relationship
ensues.
Do OS people love more than one object?
Indeed,
polyamorous relationships exist among objectùm-sexual individuals and
may involve objects that are related via structure, location, and/or
function.
